One- and multi-diode PV module models: PSO-based parameter extraction and performance evaluation under conventional and low-concentration photovoltaic conditions

Authors

  • Olfa Bel Hadj Brahim Kechiche Higher School of Science and Technology of Hammam Sousse, Laboratory of Energy and Materials (LR11ES34), University of Sousse, Rue Abbassi Lamine, 4011 Hammam Sousse, Tunisia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1015-2369
  • Mahmoud Hamouda National Engineering School of Sousse, LATIS - Laboratory of Advanced Technology and Intelligent Systems, University of Sousse, 4023 Sousse, Tunisia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2919-1819
  • Aissa Chouder Department of Electronics, Laboratory LGE, University Mohamed Boudiaf of M’sila, 28000 M’sila, Algeria https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9653-053X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32397/tesea.vol7.n1.931

Keywords:

Photovoltaic models, Low-concentration photovoltaic (LCPV), Parameters estimation, Fill factor, Efficiency

Abstract

This study investigates the performance of diode-based photovoltaic (PV) modules models by analyzing their effectiveness in predicting the electric behviour under conventional solar irradiation and low-concentration photovoltaic (LCPV) conditions. The parameters of one-diode (1-DM), two-diode (2-DM), three-diode (3-DM) and four-diode models (4-DM) are first extracted using the particle swarm optimization technique (PSO) and validated through a comparative analysis with experimental measurements carried out on a PV module (ISOFOTON 106 W-12 V) in real-world temperature and irradiation conditions of 27.2°C and 755 W/m², respectively. The findings reveal that the 4-DM exhibits the minimum deviation from experimental data in predicting key performance metrics such as short-circuit current (Isc), open-circuit voltage (Voc), and maximum output power (Pm). However, this increased accuracy comes at the cost of higher computational complexity in optimizing the 4-DM’s parameters. The studies carried out under several low-concentration photovoltaic conditions show clearly the limitation of the 1-DM in terms of predicted (Pm), efficiency, and fill factor (FF). Indeed, the gaps in the obtained values of efficiency and FF with respect to the 4-DM increase with the concentration ratio and reach 0.74% and 0.04, respectively, at 3 suns. The performances obtained with the 2-DM and 3-DM remain stable and close to those of the 4-DM with constant gaps in the obtained values of efficiency and FF, remaining close to 0.1% and 0.01, respectively, regardless of the concentration ratio. The insights gained from this work underscore the significance of selecting an appropriate PV model for LCPV systems, balancing accuracy and computational efficiency.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Gaëtan Masson, Melodie de l’Epine, and Izumi Kaizuka. Technology Collaboration Programme by International Energy Agency Photovoltaic Power Systems Programme PVPS Task 1 Strategic PV Analysis and Outreach. Technical report, IEA Photovoltaic Power Systems Programme (PVPS), 2024. Accessed: 2026-02-02.

F. Bariloche. SCIENCE AND ACADEMIA AEE-Institute for Sustainable Technologies (AEE-INTEC) Council on Energy, Environment and Water (CEEW). Technical report, Council on Energy, Environment and Water (CEEW), 2024. Accessed: 2026-02-02.

Olorunshogo Benjamin Ogundipe, Azubuike Chukwudi Okwandu, and Sanni Ayinde Abdulwaheed. Recent advances in solar photovoltaic technologies: Efficiency, materials, and applications. GSC Advanced Research and Reviews, 20(1):159–175, July 2024.

Eduardo Manuel Godinho Rodrigues, Radu Godina, Mousa Marzband, and Edris Pouresmaeil. Simulation and Comparison of Mathematical Models of PV Cells with Growing Levels of Complexity. Energies, 11(11):2902, October 2018.

Mohammed Aidoud, Chams-Eddine Feraga, Mohcene Bechouat, Moussa Sedraoui, and Sami Kahla. Development of photovoltaic cell models using fundamental modeling approaches. Energy Procedia, 162:263–274, April 2019.

Dalia Yousri, Dalia Allam, M.B. Eteiba, and Ponnuthurai Nagaratnam Suganthan. Static and dynamic photovoltaic models’ parameters identification using Chaotic Heterogeneous Comprehensive Learning Particle Swarm Optimizer variants. Energy Conversion and Management, 182:546–563, February 2019.

Manish Kumar Singla, Mohammad Aljaidi, Jyoti Gupta, Murodbek Safaraliev, Ramesh Kumar, Ziad M Ali, Mohammed H Alsharif, and Mun-Kyeom Kim. Optimizing solar cell models: a multi-objective parameter estimation algorithm for improved photovoltaic system performance. Physica Scripta, 100(1):016006, December 2024.

Olfa Bel Hadj Brahim Kechiche and Marwa Hamza. Enhancement of a commercial PV module performance under Low Concentrated Photovoltaic (LCPV) conditions: A numerical study. Renewable Energy Focus, 41:258–267, June 2022.

Olfa Bel Hadj Brahim Kechiche and Habib Sammouda. Concentrator Photovoltaic System (CPV): Maximum Power Point Techniques (MPPT) Design and Performance. IntechOpen, October 2022.

Kolli Harish Kumar, Ahmed M. Daabo, Malay K. Karmakar, and Harish Hirani. Solar parabolic dish collector for concentrated solar thermal systems: a review and recommendations. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(22):32335–32367, February 2022.

Damasen Ikwaba Paul. Application of compound parabolic concentrators to solar photovoltaic conversion: A comprehensive review. International Journal of Energy Research, 43(9):4003–4050, April 2019.

Faisal Masood, Nursyarizal Bin Mohd Nor, Perumal Nallagownden, Irraivan Elamvazuthi, Rahman Saidur, Mohammad Azad Alam, Javed Akhter, Mohammad Yusuf, Mubbashar Mehmood, and Mujahid Ali. A Review of Recent Developments and Applications of Compound Parabolic Concentrator-Based Hybrid Solar Photovoltaic/Thermal Collectors. Sustainability, 14(9):5529, May 2022.

Dilip Yadav, Nidhi Singh, Vikas Singh Bhadoria, Vasiliki Vita, Georgios Fotis, Eleftherios G. Tsampasis, and Theodoros I. Maris. Analysis of the Factors Influencing the Performance of Single- and Multi-Diode PV Solar Modules. IEEE Access, 11:95507–95525, 2023.

Zhuo Meng, Yiman Zhao, Shiqing Tang, and Yize Sun. An efficient datasheet-based parameters extraction method for two-diode photovoltaic cell and cells model. Renewable Energy, 153:1174–1182, June 2020.

Nandhini Kullampalayam Murugaiyan, Kumar Chandrasekaran, Magdalin Mary Devapitchai, and Tomonobu Senjyu. Parameter Estimation of Three-Diode Photovoltaic Model Using Reinforced Learning-Based Parrot Optimizer with an Adaptive Secant Method. Sustainability, 16(23):10603, December 2024.

Mohammed H. Qais, Hany M. Hasanien, and Saad Alghuwainem. Identification of electrical parameters for three-diode photovoltaic model using analytical and sunflower optimization algorithm. Applied Energy, 250:109–117, September 2019.

Bhanu Prakash Saripalli, Bharati Gamgula, Revathi Ravilisetty, Prashant Kumar, Gagan Singh, and Sonika Singh. Advanced parameter extraction optimization technique for the four-diode model approach. e-Prime - Advances in Electrical Engineering, Electronics and Energy, 10:100861, December 2024.

Wafa Ben Youssef, Taher Maatallah, Christophe Menezo, and Sassi Ben Nasrallah. Modeling and optimization of a solar system based on concentrating photovoltaic/thermal collector. Solar Energy, 170:301–313, August 2018.

Lifeng Li, Bo Wang, Johannes Pottas, and Wojciech Lipinski. Design of a compound parabolic concentrator for a multi-source ´ high-flux solar simulator. Solar Energy, 183:805–811, May 2019.

Mohamed Elashmawy. Improving the performance of a parabolic concentrator solar tracking-tubular solar still (PCST-TSS) using gravel as a sensible heat storage material. Desalination, 473:114182, January 2020.

Pankaj Yadav, Brijesh Tripathi, Makarand Lokhande, and Manoj Kumar. Effect of temperature and concentration on commercial silicon module based low-concentration photovoltaic system. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 5(1), January 2013.

Bhanu Prakash Saripalli, Gagan Singh, and Sonika Singh. Cell Modelling and Analysis of Five-Parameter Three Diode model of Photovoltaic Module. In 2021 IEEE 4th International Conference on Computing, Power and Communication Technologies (GUCON), page 1–7. IEEE, September 2021.

Habbati Bellia Assia and Moulay Benine Fatima. Detailed modeling of two diode photovoltaic module using MATLAB simulik. International Journal of Power Electronics and Drive Systems (IJPEDS), 10(3):1603, September 2019.

Saripalli Bhanu Prakash, Gagan Singh, and Sonika Singh. Modeling and Performance Analysis of Simplified Two-Diode Model of Photovoltaic Cells. Frontiers in Physics, 9, October 2021.

KN Ukoima and OA Ekwe. Three-diode model and simulation of photovoltaic (PV) cells. Umudike J Eng Technol (UJET), pages 108–116, 2019.

Vandana Khanna, B.K. Das, Dinesh Bisht, Vandana, and P.K. Singh. A three diode model for industrial solar cells and estimation of solar cell parameters using PSO algorithm. Renewable Energy, 78:105–113, June 2015.

Kensuke Nishioka, Nobuhiro Sakitani, Yukiharu Uraoka, and Takashi Fuyuki. Analysis of multicrystalline silicon solar cells by modified 3-diode equivalent circuit model taking leakage current through periphery into consideration. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 91(13):1222–1227, August 2007.

Hazem Hassan Ellithy, Adel M. Taha, Hany M. Hasanien, Mahmoud A. Attia, Adel El-Shahat, and Shady H. E. Abdel Aleem. Estimation of Parameters of Triple Diode Photovoltaic Models Using Hybrid Particle Swarm and Grey Wolf Optimization. Sustainability, 14(15):9046, July 2022.

Beant Singh, Manish Kumar Singla, and Parag Nijhawan. Parameter estimation of four diode solar photovoltaic cell using hybrid algorithm. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 44(2):4597–4613, May 2022.

Ali M. Jasim, Baraa M. Albaker, and Hussein Jumma Jabir. Modeling and Simulation of Simplified Quadruple Diode Solar PV Module Under Influence of Environmental Conditions and Parasitic Resistance. TEM Journal, page 757–770, February 2024.

Manish Kumar Singla, Jyoti Gupta, Mohammed H. Alsharif, Mun-Kyeom Kim, Mohammad Aljaidi, and Murodbek Safaraliev. A robust multi-objective optimization algorithm for accurate parameter estimation for solar cell models. Soft Computing, 28(19):11265–11277, July 2024.

Baojie Li, Demba Diallo, Anne Migan-Dubois, and Claude Delpha. Performance evaluation of IEC 60891:2021 procedures for correcting I–V curves of photovoltaic modules under healthy and faulty conditions. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 31(5):474–493, November 2022.

Michel Piliougine, Paula Sánchez-Friera, and Giovanni Spagnuolo. Comparative of IEC 60891 and Other Procedures for Temperature and Irradiance Corrections to Measured I–V Characteristics of Photovoltaic Devices. Energies, 17(3):566, January 2024.

Hugo Nunes, Jose Pombo, Joao Fermeiro, Silvio Mariano, and Maria do Rosario Calado. Particle Swarm Optimization for photovoltaic model identification. In 2017 International Young Engineers Forum (YEF-ECE), page 53–58. IEEE, May 2017.

Rongjie Wang. Parameter Identification of Photovoltaic Cell Model Based on Enhanced Particle Swarm Optimization. Sustainability, 13(2):840, January 2021.

K. P. O’Donnell and X. Chen. Temperature dependence of semiconductor band gaps. Applied Physics Letters, 58(25):2924–2926, June 1991.

Carlo Renno and Fabio Petito. Design and modeling of a concentrating photovoltaic thermal (CPV/T) system for a domestic application. Energy and Buildings, 62:392–402, July 2013.

Joseph Appelbaum and Tamir Maor. Dependence of PV Module Temperature on Incident Time-Dependent Solar Spectrum. Applied Sciences, 10(3):914, January 2020.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-10

How to Cite

One- and multi-diode PV module models: PSO-based parameter extraction and performance evaluation under conventional and low-concentration photovoltaic conditions. (2026). Transactions on Energy Systems and Engineering Applications, 7(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.32397/tesea.vol7.n1.931

Similar Articles

21-30 of 82

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.